Thursday, 19 September 2013

On this day...

Not on this day...

  On this day...
Scientology secrets revealed in 2 million dollar consumer fraud case // Scientology on trial
Date: Wednesday, 19 September 1979
Publisher: Bay Guardian (San Francisco)
Author: Richard H. Meeker
Main source: link (674 KiB)

How a Portland jury got a crash course in one of the oddest "religions" ever created and awarded the plaintiff more than $2. million

Note: This summer, a jury in Portland spent a month listening to testimony in a $4 million lawsuit over the practices of the Church of Scientology there. The plaintiff: Julie Christofferson, a young Portland woman who was a follower of Scientology in 1975 and 1976. The defendants: three local Scientology organizations and one of their leaders.

Richard H. Meeker, an editor and reporter for Portland's Willamette Week, attended the entire trial and wrote the following report.


PORTLAND—The jury's verdict is in on Scientology in Oregon: It's a fraud. In a decision that shocked a packed courtroom last month, a Multnomah County jury of seven women and five men announced its decision that local Scientology organizations and one of their leaders had misrepresented themselves and engaged in acts of outrageous conduct against plaintiff Julie Christofferson.

The jury's decision, coupled with its award of more than $2 million to Christofferson, represents a grave threat to the future of America's largest cult. If the verdict survives the appeals that are certain to follow, it will mean Christofferson is entitled to approximately two-thirds of the net worth of all the known Scientology holdings in the state of Oregon.

In particular, the jury decided the Church of Scientology's Mission of Davis, in downtown Portland, must pay Christofferson $1 million in punitive damages. The Delphian Foundation, a Scientologist-run boarding school on the site of a former Jesuit novitiate in Sheridan, owes her $600,000; the Church of Scientology of Portland, also downtown, $300,000; and Martin Samuels, president of both the Mission of Davis and the Delphian Foundation, $14,000. The four defendants together were ordered to pay Christofferson another $153,000.20 in compensatory damages.

This case represents the first time in this country that 12 average citizens have been asked to make a legally binding determination of the central question about Scientology: Is it a bona fide religion, or is it a confidence racket?

The size of the jury's award and the unanimity of the verdict provided a resounding answer. "We felt she had been duped from the start," jury foreman John Kekel said minutes after he had handed the verdict to Circuit Court Judge Robert Paul Jones.

[Picture / Caption: Plaintiff's attorney Garry P. McMurry asks Julie Christofferson to read from the works of L. Ron Hubbard during the first week of trial.]



Christofferson's stunning Aug. 15 court victory could be the beginning of the end for America's most successful cult group. Scientology has grown steadily since its inception in the 1950s, and has weathered government attacks in this country, England and Australia. The self-styled church claims a membership of three million in America and nearly four million worldwide.

Now, as a result of this $2 million verdict, other former Scientologists across the United States are sure to follow Christofferson's example and file lawsuits of their own. Further, several of the cult's key leaders will go on trial in federal court next month on charges of burgling U.S. government offices in Washington, D.C. They could end up in jail. Finally, the church's founder, L. Ron Hubbard, hasn't been seen publicly for several years, and many anti-Scientologists believe he may be dead.

Put quite simply, Scientology faces a troubled future. That future, however, was not the concern of the jury during the month-long trial, which began at 2 pm on July 16. Rather, the 12 jurors, only one of whom had ever heard of the cult before the trial, got a crash course in one of the oddest "religions" ever created.

The cult follows the teachings of founder Hubbard as they are stated in some 25 million words of church doctrine. These combine aspects of Eastern mysticism and Western religious thought and psychiatry to form an arcane system of beliefs and practices Scientology even has its own special language, containing words like "thetan," "engram" and "bullbaiting."

Despite its strangeness, the cult has succeeded in continuing to recruit new members, in getting its members' loyalty as well as their money, and in protecting itself from the acts of deprogrammers and angry parents. By hiding behind a veil of religious protection and by arming itself with an array of well-paid lawyers, Scientology has managed to have more staying power and to maintain its aura of secrecy better than any other contemporary cult.

What the jury heard during the trial was the story of how Scientology works, where the money comes from and where it goes, and how in the past five years a man by the name of Martin Samuels created in Oregon a multimillion-dollar-a-year operation with the assistance of hundreds of people like Julie Christofferson.
While this evidence was presented to the jury in a piecemeal fashion, it is possible to form it into a clear picture of the inner workings of this hitherto unexposed cult.



The testimony of Christofferson and a series of other former Scientologists offered graphic evidence of the cult's means of attracting new converts and quickly separating them from their money, friends and families.
Though Christofferson visited the downtown headquarters of the church's Mission of Davis on the advice of a friend from high school, most new recruits get their introduction to Scientology on the sidewalks near the mission's offices at Broadway and SW Salmon Street.

People called "public registrars"—sometimes referred to as "field service men"—ask other young people if they'd like to come inside to hear an introductory lecture on Scientology. Several witnesses testified that new recruits are referred to as "raw meat' and are quickly processed through a carefully designed orientation program.

First, there's an introductory lecture, which few Scientologists seem to remember well. As one deprogrammed cult member, Alan Wilson, described the scene, "We were greeted by a lot of smiling faces, shaking hands, a lot of hubbub . . . After that [the unmemorable lecture, attended by 20 or 25 people], I had a conversation with someone about my hangups. I'd just had quite a run-in with my girl. He suggested our problems were related to a communications breakdown.

"I eventually signed up for the Communications Course," Wilson continued. "I started the course that night. I had been approached on the street at 1 pm and I didn't get out until 11 that night. I was there the next day for 11 hours."

Wilson, who shortly before this experience had been involved in a car wreck that had mangled one of his hips, had been planning to attend chef's school at Clark Community College in Vancouver, Wash., and was downtown with a friend to buy new clothes for school. Within a few days he had decided not to attend the chef's school and had donated some $7,000 of his insurance settlement from the accident to the Mission of Davis to pay for a series of courses and counseling sessions.

A key ingredient in getting new recruits sold on Scientology seems to be the introductory Communications Course, which costs only $50 and is offered with a money-back guarantee.

As Christofferson and others described it, the course consists of a rigorous, time-consuming series of "training routines." They are geared to get students "to clear their minds of all thoughts"; to be able "to speak in a new unit of time"—that is, unemotionally and without changes of inflection; to sit unflinchingly and unresponsively during hours of bullbaiting— taunting by other students that may involve obscene language and overtly sexual gestures; and to ask and repeatedly answer the questions, "Do birds fly?" and "Do fish swim?" The course lasts several weeks.

[Picture / Caption: L. Ron Hubbard's face adorns the wailing room of The Delphian Foundation in Sheridan, Oregon.]

Throughout the course, Christofferson said she was fed a steady diet of exaggerated but impressive claims about the background and experiences of cult founder Hubbard and the potential of Dianetics, the Hubbard-devised "science of the mind." The list of promises, as set out in Christofferson's complaint against the Scientologists and as stated by witnesses at the trial and in the writings of Hubbard himself, is staggering:

* That the Communications Course would provide Christofferson with more knowledge of the mind than is possessed by any psychologist or psychiatrist;
* That the course would help her with her college work;
* That "auditing"—Scientology's version of the confessional, in which parishioners hold two tin cans attached to a crude galvanometer and answer questions concerning intimate aspects of their lives—can develop creativity; cure neuroses, criminality, insanity, psychosomatic ills, homosexuality and drug dependence; and allow one to control his or her own emotions and the physical universe;
* That Dianetics is scientifically provable and cures asthma, arthritis, rheumatism, ulcers, toothaches, pneumonia, colds and color blindness; and
* That L. Ron Hubbard is an engineer and nuclear physicist who has a degree from Princeton University and is a graduate of George Washington University who revealed Dianetics to mankind as a service to humanity, with no intent to profit therefrom.

During the course of the trial, several Scientology defense witnesses admitted that Hubbard had graduated from neither university and was getting regular payments from the Delphian Foundation. However, they did suggest that the application of Hubbard's discoveries could cure asthma, colds and nearsightedness.

During the communications course, witnesses testified, other mission registrars engage students in lengthy conversations in their offices. They use claims for Scientology like those listed above to get students to take a package of additional courses—"Student Hat" (at $250 in 1975) and Hubbard Standard Dianetics (at $500 in 1975)—as well as auditing on the E-meter in a process known as Life Repair. Auditing presently requires donations to the church of $150 per hour.

The witnesses charged that these internal registrars did more than just encourage continuation in Scientology—that they quickly ascertained the financial resources of their students and regulated their progress in the Communications Course to vary inversely with the amount of money they were willing to part with. These registrars also help new recruits formulate "Battle Plans" to use in raising funds from friends and relatives. If all other resources fail, the Mission of Davis has its own credit union to lend students the money they need "to stay on course."

One of the mission's most successful registrars at the time Christofferson was a member of the church was the Rev. Laird Caruthers. He testified that in a two-year period he had sold courses and counseling worth $500,000. During her first month with Scientology, in July and August 1975, Christofferson had several talks with Caruthers and readily gave the church several thousand dollars. By the time she left the cult she had "donated" to it a total of $3,000.20.



According to defendant Samuels and his wife, who oversee most of Scientology's operations here, the goal of Scientology is to "clear" the world. That is, Scientologists believe that people are basically good, but that they're unnecessarily unhappy as a result of engrams—bad brain waves that resulted from unpleasant past experiences. The religion's courses and counseling, they say, will clear a person of these difficulties and leave the "parishioner" in control of his or her mind and body, and in a position to attempt an exalted spiritual state known as "operating thetan."

(Thetan is Scientology's word for the human spirit; once a Scientologist becomes clear, he or she then can proceed through the eight levels of Operating Thetans to attain the goal of complete spiritual control. Few, however, have been able to do so.)

As Christofferson and the others said it, though, Scientology's true purpose is to get absolute control of its members and take as much of their money as possible. One of the central techniques used toward this goal is that of paying close attention to parishioners' behavior by means of "ethics officers." What the witnesses said about these church staffers and their orders provided some of the oddest testimony of the entire trial.
Scientologists, for example, pay careful attention to outsiders they label "PTS's." A PTS, according to the writings of Hubbard, is a potential trouble source—someone antagonistic to Scientology.

Cult rules, as laid out in a multitude of "Policy letters" and "Bulletins" require that any practicing Scientologist who knows a PTS must file a "knowledge report" on the person with an ethics officer. The ethics officer then counsels the person making the report on how to "handle" the trouble source. If the so-called "PTS handling" does not work, however, and the trouble source remains antagonistic to the cult, the next step, according to many witnesses, is to "disconnect"— sever all ties—from the PTS. This practice, the witnesses suggested, creates serious rifts between Scientologists and their parents and former friends; it also creates in church members stronger ties to Scientology.

There was also testimony about another activity of church ethics officers, also allegedly designed to strengthen Scientology's hold on its members. This is the doctrine of "conditions" in which cult staff members who fail in their work are assigned by ethics officers to what are called "lower conditions"—including "Confusion," "Enemy," "Treason" and "Liability."

For every condition there is a mindless formula that must be repeated in order for the staffer to work his or her way back to "normal."

A graphic example of these "ethics" at work was provided by a Xerox copy of formulas performed by a young woman named Diana Burger. The following words were written on the piece of paper in a large, childish hand:

"Find out where you are.
"I am here in the city of Portland the state of Oregon, located in the United States of America, Planet, Earth, in the glaxy [sic] called the Miky [sic] Way, which is a small part of the universe. I work on Salmon Street and live on 12th Street."
"Find out who you are
"I am me, Diana Burger, nothing more and nothing less, just me, I am a thetan, I know what i know and i know that i do exist here & now."

Two of the plaintiff's witnesses were psychologist Margaret Singer and psychiatrist and neurologist John Clark. Singer conducted studies of American prisoners of war on their return from Korea and has become an expert in the field of mind control she calls "persuasive technique." The practices of Scientology and other modern religious cults, she testified, "are very similar to what happened in Korea . . . They've been used down through the centuries."

Singer also testified she had interviewed Christofferson on three separate occasions for a total of 10 hours and that she believed the young woman had suffered a form of mental damage that she labeled "stress response syndrome."

Clark, who maintains an affiliation with Harvard University, gave similar testimony about what he called "the destructive cults." Though he had not examined Christofferson personally, he, too, stated that she had suffered mental damage at the hands of Scientology.



Another element of the fraud charged by Christofferson was that Scientologists at the Mission of Davis lied to her to induce her to go to the Delphian Foundation in Sheridan to act as a staff member there. The plaintiff testified that she had arrived in Portland in summer 1975, planning to attend the University of Montana in the fall. Her interests were in architecture and engineering.

While studying Scientology at the Mission of Davis, however, she said she was told she could take college-level courses in the subjects that interested her out at the Delphian Foundation, that the foundation was on the verge of becoming an accredited university, and that it had so impressed government officials with its work on energy-saving devices that it had been offered sizable government grants.

When she got there, however, she was made to do menial farm labor for a few weeks and then was assigned the task of "Nanny Hat"—taking care of three small children of other Scientologists at Delphi. For all this she paid very little, lost several scholarships to the University of Montana, and was unable to take any courses in architecture or engineering.



That winter in Sheridan, however, Christofferson told the Delphian Foundation's ethics officer, a woman by the name of Madeline Munoz, that her mother was becoming increasingly antagonistic to Scientology. After Julie failed to "handle" her mother's "PTS-ness" she was ordered to return to Portland and to stop taking courses until she could change her mother's attitudes.

She worked as a waitress at the Heathman Hotel and kept in regular contact with her ethics officer at the mission, one Jim Brooks, but had little success with her mother. Finally, in April 1976, Christofferson's mother, Alma Hall, tricked her daughter into returning home to Eureka, Mont., and had her deprogrammed there. Christofferson subsequently visited with the Ted Patrick organization in San Diego and returned to Portland to participate in the deprogrammings of other Scientologists.

For this activity, she testified, she was expelled from the church and labeled a "suppressive person." That label, Christofferson said she had been led to understand, meant that she was what Scientology considers "Fair Game"—subject to being lied to, cheated, tricked and even "destroyed" by other Scientologists.

Most likely, it was this alleged atmosphere of retribution—coupled with the testimony of Singer and Clark—that caused the jurors to find that the four defendants had engaged in outrageous conduct.

Read more here...

Scientology secrets revealed in 2 million dollar consumer fraud case
Scientology on trial

The size of the jury's award and the unanimity of the verdict provided a resounding answer. "We felt she had been duped from the start," jury foreman John Kekel said minutes after he had handed the verdict to Circuit Court Judge Robert Paul Jones.

And they still do this to their children today...

And third world children...


No comments:

Post a Comment