Not on this day...
On this day...
Scientology secrets revealed in 2 million dollar consumer fraud case // Scientology on trial
Date: Wednesday, 19 September 1979
Publisher: Bay Guardian (San Francisco)
Author: Richard H. Meeker
Main source: link (674 KiB)
How a Portland jury got a crash course in one of the
oddest "religions" ever created and awarded the plaintiff more than $2.
million
Note: This summer, a jury in Portland spent
a month listening to testimony in a $4 million lawsuit over the
practices of the Church of Scientology there. The plaintiff: Julie
Christofferson, a young Portland woman who was a follower of Scientology
in 1975 and 1976. The defendants: three local Scientology organizations
and one of their leaders.
Richard H. Meeker, an
editor and reporter for Portland's Willamette Week, attended the entire
trial and wrote the following report.
BY RICHARD H. MEEKER
PORTLAND—The
jury's verdict is in on Scientology in Oregon: It's a fraud. In a
decision that shocked a packed courtroom last month, a Multnomah County
jury of seven women and five men announced its decision that local
Scientology organizations and one of their leaders had misrepresented
themselves and engaged in acts of outrageous conduct against plaintiff
Julie Christofferson.
The jury's decision, coupled with
its award of more than $2 million to Christofferson, represents a grave
threat to the future of America's largest cult. If the verdict survives
the appeals that are certain to follow, it will mean Christofferson is
entitled to approximately two-thirds of the net worth of all the known
Scientology holdings in the state of Oregon.
In
particular, the jury decided the Church of Scientology's Mission of
Davis, in downtown Portland, must pay Christofferson $1 million in
punitive damages. The Delphian Foundation, a Scientologist-run boarding
school on the site of a former Jesuit novitiate in Sheridan, owes her
$600,000; the Church of Scientology of Portland, also downtown,
$300,000; and Martin Samuels, president of both the Mission of Davis and
the Delphian Foundation, $14,000. The four defendants together were
ordered to pay Christofferson another $153,000.20 in compensatory
damages.
This case represents the first time in this
country that 12 average citizens have been asked to make a legally
binding determination of the central question about Scientology: Is it a
bona fide religion, or is it a confidence racket?
The
size of the jury's award and the unanimity of the verdict provided a
resounding answer. "We felt she had been duped from the start," jury
foreman John Kekel said minutes after he had handed the verdict to
Circuit Court Judge Robert Paul Jones.
[Picture /
Caption: Plaintiff's attorney Garry P. McMurry asks Julie Christofferson
to read from the works of L. Ron Hubbard during the first week of
trial.]
ESCHATOLOGY NOW?
Christofferson's
stunning Aug. 15 court victory could be the beginning of the end for
America's most successful cult group. Scientology has grown steadily
since its inception in the 1950s, and has weathered government attacks
in this country, England and Australia. The self-styled church claims a
membership of three million in America and nearly four million
worldwide.
Now, as a result of this $2 million verdict,
other former Scientologists across the United States are sure to follow
Christofferson's example and file lawsuits of their own. Further,
several of the cult's key leaders will go on trial in federal court next
month on charges of burgling U.S. government offices in Washington,
D.C. They could end up in jail. Finally, the church's founder, L. Ron
Hubbard, hasn't been seen publicly for several years, and many
anti-Scientologists believe he may be dead.
Put quite
simply, Scientology faces a troubled future. That future, however, was
not the concern of the jury during the month-long trial, which began at 2
pm on July 16. Rather, the 12 jurors, only one of whom had ever heard
of the cult before the trial, got a crash course in one of the oddest
"religions" ever created.
The cult follows the teachings
of founder Hubbard as they are stated in some 25 million words of church
doctrine. These combine aspects of Eastern mysticism and Western
religious thought and psychiatry to form an arcane system of beliefs and
practices Scientology even has its own special language, containing
words like "thetan," "engram" and "bullbaiting."
Despite
its strangeness, the cult has succeeded in continuing to recruit new
members, in getting its members' loyalty as well as their money, and in
protecting itself from the acts of deprogrammers and angry parents. By
hiding behind a veil of religious protection and by arming itself with
an array of well-paid lawyers, Scientology has managed to have more
staying power and to maintain its aura of secrecy better than any other
contemporary cult.
What the jury heard during the trial
was the story of how Scientology works, where the money comes from and
where it goes, and how in the past five years a man by the name of
Martin Samuels created in Oregon a multimillion-dollar-a-year operation
with the assistance of hundreds of people like Julie Christofferson.
While
this evidence was presented to the jury in a piecemeal fashion, it is
possible to form it into a clear picture of the inner workings of this
hitherto unexposed cult.
HOW IT WORKS
The
testimony of Christofferson and a series of other former Scientologists
offered graphic evidence of the cult's means of attracting new converts
and quickly separating them from their money, friends and families.
Though
Christofferson visited the downtown headquarters of the church's
Mission of Davis on the advice of a friend from high school, most new
recruits get their introduction to Scientology on the sidewalks near the
mission's offices at Broadway and SW Salmon Street.
People
called "public registrars"—sometimes referred to as "field service
men"—ask other young people if they'd like to come inside to hear an
introductory lecture on Scientology. Several witnesses testified that
new recruits are referred to as "raw meat' and are quickly processed
through a carefully designed orientation program.
First,
there's an introductory lecture, which few Scientologists seem to
remember well. As one deprogrammed cult member, Alan Wilson, described
the scene, "We were greeted by a lot of smiling faces, shaking hands, a
lot of hubbub . . . After that [the unmemorable lecture, attended by 20
or 25 people], I had a conversation with someone about my hangups. I'd
just had quite a run-in with my girl. He suggested our problems were
related to a communications breakdown.
"I eventually
signed up for the Communications Course," Wilson continued. "I started
the course that night. I had been approached on the street at 1 pm and I
didn't get out until 11 that night. I was there the next day for 11
hours."
Wilson, who shortly before this experience had
been involved in a car wreck that had mangled one of his hips, had been
planning to attend chef's school at Clark Community College in
Vancouver, Wash., and was downtown with a friend to buy new clothes for
school. Within a few days he had decided not to attend the chef's school
and had donated some $7,000 of his insurance settlement from the
accident to the Mission of Davis to pay for a series of courses and
counseling sessions.
A key ingredient in getting new
recruits sold on Scientology seems to be the introductory Communications
Course, which costs only $50 and is offered with a money-back
guarantee.
As Christofferson and others described it, the
course consists of a rigorous, time-consuming series of "training
routines." They are geared to get students "to clear their minds of all
thoughts"; to be able "to speak in a new unit of time"—that is,
unemotionally and without changes of inflection; to sit unflinchingly
and unresponsively during hours of bullbaiting— taunting by other
students that may involve obscene language and overtly sexual gestures;
and to ask and repeatedly answer the questions, "Do birds fly?" and "Do
fish swim?" The course lasts several weeks.
[Picture / Caption: L. Ron Hubbard's face adorns the wailing room of The Delphian Foundation in Sheridan, Oregon.]
Throughout
the course, Christofferson said she was fed a steady diet of
exaggerated but impressive claims about the background and experiences
of cult founder Hubbard and the potential of Dianetics, the
Hubbard-devised "science of the mind." The list of promises, as set out
in Christofferson's complaint against the Scientologists and as stated
by witnesses at the trial and in the writings of Hubbard himself, is
staggering:
* That the Communications Course would
provide Christofferson with more knowledge of the mind than is possessed
by any psychologist or psychiatrist;
* That the course would help her with her college work;
*
That "auditing"—Scientology's version of the confessional, in which
parishioners hold two tin cans attached to a crude galvanometer and
answer questions concerning intimate aspects of their lives—can develop
creativity; cure neuroses, criminality, insanity, psychosomatic ills,
homosexuality and drug dependence; and allow one to control his or her
own emotions and the physical universe;
* That Dianetics is
scientifically provable and cures asthma, arthritis, rheumatism, ulcers,
toothaches, pneumonia, colds and color blindness; and
* That L. Ron
Hubbard is an engineer and nuclear physicist who has a degree from
Princeton University and is a graduate of George Washington University
who revealed Dianetics to mankind as a service to humanity, with no
intent to profit therefrom.
During the course of the
trial, several Scientology defense witnesses admitted that Hubbard had
graduated from neither university and was getting regular payments from
the Delphian Foundation. However, they did suggest that the application
of Hubbard's discoveries could cure asthma, colds and nearsightedness.
During
the communications course, witnesses testified, other mission
registrars engage students in lengthy conversations in their offices.
They use claims for Scientology like those listed above to get students
to take a package of additional courses—"Student Hat" (at $250 in 1975)
and Hubbard Standard Dianetics (at $500 in 1975)—as well as auditing on
the E-meter in a process known as Life Repair. Auditing presently
requires donations to the church of $150 per hour.
The
witnesses charged that these internal registrars did more than just
encourage continuation in Scientology—that they quickly ascertained the
financial resources of their students and regulated their progress in
the Communications Course to vary inversely with the amount of money
they were willing to part with. These registrars also help new recruits
formulate "Battle Plans" to use in raising funds from friends and
relatives. If all other resources fail, the Mission of Davis has its own
credit union to lend students the money they need "to stay on course."
One
of the mission's most successful registrars at the time Christofferson
was a member of the church was the Rev. Laird Caruthers. He testified
that in a two-year period he had sold courses and counseling worth
$500,000. During her first month with Scientology, in July and August
1975, Christofferson had several talks with Caruthers and readily gave
the church several thousand dollars. By the time she left the cult she
had "donated" to it a total of $3,000.20.
ETHICS
According
to defendant Samuels and his wife, who oversee most of Scientology's
operations here, the goal of Scientology is to "clear" the world. That
is, Scientologists believe that people are basically good, but that
they're unnecessarily unhappy as a result of engrams—bad brain waves
that resulted from unpleasant past experiences. The religion's courses
and counseling, they say, will clear a person of these difficulties and
leave the "parishioner" in control of his or her mind and body, and in a
position to attempt an exalted spiritual state known as "operating
thetan."
(Thetan is Scientology's word for the human
spirit; once a Scientologist becomes clear, he or she then can proceed
through the eight levels of Operating Thetans to attain the goal of
complete spiritual control. Few, however, have been able to do so.)
As
Christofferson and the others said it, though, Scientology's true
purpose is to get absolute control of its members and take as much of
their money as possible. One of the central techniques used toward this
goal is that of paying close attention to parishioners' behavior by
means of "ethics officers." What the witnesses said about these church
staffers and their orders provided some of the oddest testimony of the
entire trial.
Scientologists, for example, pay careful
attention to outsiders they label "PTS's." A PTS, according to the
writings of Hubbard, is a potential trouble source—someone antagonistic
to Scientology.
Cult rules, as laid out in a multitude of
"Policy letters" and "Bulletins" require that any practicing
Scientologist who knows a PTS must file a "knowledge report" on the
person with an ethics officer. The ethics officer then counsels the
person making the report on how to "handle" the trouble source. If the
so-called "PTS handling" does not work, however, and the trouble source
remains antagonistic to the cult, the next step, according to many
witnesses, is to "disconnect"— sever all ties—from the PTS. This
practice, the witnesses suggested, creates serious rifts between
Scientologists and their parents and former friends; it also creates in
church members stronger ties to Scientology.
There was
also testimony about another activity of church ethics officers, also
allegedly designed to strengthen Scientology's hold on its members. This
is the doctrine of "conditions" in which cult staff members who fail in
their work are assigned by ethics officers to what are called "lower
conditions"—including "Confusion," "Enemy," "Treason" and "Liability."
For
every condition there is a mindless formula that must be repeated in
order for the staffer to work his or her way back to "normal."
A
graphic example of these "ethics" at work was provided by a Xerox copy
of formulas performed by a young woman named Diana Burger. The following
words were written on the piece of paper in a large, childish hand:
"Confusion
"Find out where you are.
"I am here in the city of Portland the state of Oregon, located in the United States of America, Planet, Earth, in the glaxy [sic] called the Miky [sic] Way, which is a small part of the universe. I work on Salmon Street and live on 12th Street."
"Enemy
"Find out who you are
"I
am me, Diana Burger, nothing more and nothing less, just me, I am a
thetan, I know what i know and i know that i do exist here & now."
Two
of the plaintiff's witnesses were psychologist Margaret Singer and
psychiatrist and neurologist John Clark. Singer conducted studies of
American prisoners of war on their return from Korea and has become an
expert in the field of mind control she calls "persuasive technique."
The practices of Scientology and other modern religious cults, she
testified, "are very similar to what happened in Korea . . . They've
been used down through the centuries."
Singer also
testified she had interviewed Christofferson on three separate occasions
for a total of 10 hours and that she believed the young woman had
suffered a form of mental damage that she labeled "stress response
syndrome."
Clark, who maintains an affiliation with
Harvard University, gave similar testimony about what he called "the
destructive cults." Though he had not examined Christofferson
personally, he, too, stated that she had suffered mental damage at the
hands of Scientology.
JULIE GOES TO DELPHI
Another
element of the fraud charged by Christofferson was that Scientologists
at the Mission of Davis lied to her to induce her to go to the Delphian
Foundation in Sheridan to act as a staff member there. The plaintiff
testified that she had arrived in Portland in summer 1975, planning to
attend the University of Montana in the fall. Her interests were in
architecture and engineering.
While studying Scientology
at the Mission of Davis, however, she said she was told she could take
college-level courses in the subjects that interested her out at the
Delphian Foundation, that the foundation was on the verge of becoming an
accredited university, and that it had so impressed government
officials with its work on energy-saving devices that it had been
offered sizable government grants.
When she got there,
however, she was made to do menial farm labor for a few weeks and then
was assigned the task of "Nanny Hat"—taking care of three small children
of other Scientologists at Delphi. For all this she paid very little,
lost several scholarships to the University of Montana, and was unable
to take any courses in architecture or engineering.
FAIR GAME
That
winter in Sheridan, however, Christofferson told the Delphian
Foundation's ethics officer, a woman by the name of Madeline Munoz, that
her mother was becoming increasingly antagonistic to Scientology. After
Julie failed to "handle" her mother's "PTS-ness" she was ordered to
return to Portland and to stop taking courses until she could change her
mother's attitudes.
She worked as a waitress at the
Heathman Hotel and kept in regular contact with her ethics officer at
the mission, one Jim Brooks, but had little success with her mother.
Finally, in April 1976, Christofferson's mother, Alma Hall, tricked her
daughter into returning home to Eureka, Mont., and had her deprogrammed
there. Christofferson subsequently visited with the Ted Patrick
organization in San Diego and returned to Portland to participate in the
deprogrammings of other Scientologists.
For this
activity, she testified, she was expelled from the church and labeled a
"suppressive person." That label, Christofferson said she had been led
to understand, meant that she was what Scientology considers "Fair
Game"—subject to being lied to, cheated, tricked and even "destroyed" by
other Scientologists.
Most likely, it was this alleged
atmosphere of retribution—coupled with the testimony of Singer and
Clark—that caused the jurors to find that the four defendants had
engaged in outrageous conduct.
Read more here...
Scientology secrets revealed in 2 million dollar consumer fraud case
Scientology on trial
The size of the jury's award and the unanimity of the verdict provided a resounding answer. "We felt she had been duped from the start," jury foreman John Kekel said minutes after he had handed the verdict to Circuit Court Judge Robert Paul Jones.
And they still do this to their children today...
And third world children...
No comments:
Post a Comment