The Process is the Product
TOPY included heterosexual couples with "open" relationships, monogamous
couples both gay and straight, transsexuals, and quite a few couples
with children plus single mothers. During the TOPY years especially we
visited other communes, in particular becoming close to the Zendik Farm,
a commune/cult dating back to Los Angeles in the acid '60s whose
emphasis is on self-sufficiency by organic farming and ecological
awareness; we studied the Manson Family, the Moonies, the Children of
God, The Source, the Mel Lyman Family, Jim Jones, the Source, the
Cockettes, and came to know people at Morningstar Ranch (another '60s
holdover in Sonoma County). Many of these communes and cults
experimented with separation of children from their biological parents
to try and avoid inherited conditioning and emotional dependency-though I
wonder if it wasn't, consciously or not, a way to try and ensure fealty
to the group and by implication the group
guru/leader/figurehead/enlightened superbeing, thereby assuring new,
ever more fanatical followers who would have known no other way of life
or belief system.
The Process
'Death-worshipping church' or apocalyptic prophets? Gary Lachman investigates the Process Church of the Final Judgement, a Sixties movement with a far-reaching influence.
May 2000
|
It was soon clear they were too intelligent and wilful to remain
Hubbard’s followers. Robert (left) and Mary Ann had ideas of their own,
and tested these successfully on some clients. Security on Fitzroy
Street was high; when Mary Ann discovered her session rooms were bugged,
she and Robert left. Mary Ann, who was sensitive to appearances,
convinced Robert to drop Moore, which she thought sounded too common,
and to adopt DeGrimston. They married soon after, and in 1964 they set
up their own system.
The Process | Articles | Features | Fortean Times UK
From Dog Press:
Ms. Jade presents a 2-part investigative report beginning with The Process Church, Satanism, street beggars discovering "free money" in Animal Rights, to the now respectable Best Friends Animal Shelter in Kanab, Utah. You will be shocked, then intrigued. From a devil worship cult, to animal sacrifice, and a tenuous connection with mass murderer Charles Manson; the impeccably researched facts are backed up by hard copy, incorporation records, and Gold Links below...
With Best Friends,
Who Needs Enemies?
Prt 1 -
Mind-bending animal sacrifice, devil
worship...
Best Friends Truth; Stranger Than Fiction
Prt 2 - The
Sanctuary, $1 to $32 million in first 5 years!
Best Friends
For Breed Bans
exploits Dangerous Dog concept for media
Best Friend's Summit & Dangerous Dogs proposed breeder/breeding restriction, Bolton reports!
Best Friend's Summit & Dangerous Dogs proposed breeder/breeding restriction, Bolton reports!
Best Friends and
The Process
by a former member,
Skepticaltheurgist
Animal Rights Terrorism
Wikileaks internal DHS report on the Animal-Rights Militants
The Future Is Here
Microchipping, nanotechnology, genetic engineering in the hands
of ALF & ELF
ALF - FBI’s #1 Domestic Terrorist
Animal Liberation Front
#1010-11091
Did Manson Borrow British Cult's Beliefs? - Charles Manson Family ...
The Process Church of the Final Judgment and the Manson Family ...
The Process - Virginia Commonwealth UniversityThe Mind Benders...
You really can't make this shit up...looks like I might have to buy this one... haven't laughed so much over scientology for quite a while, there is NOT an awful lot to laugh at where Scientology is concerned but this is pure genius... Thank you Mr. Ortega for your book review...
http://tonyortega.org/2013/05/29/mar...in-new-memoir/
She was not the only one. For the past fourteen years, John McMasters, the first Scientology clear, ap- pears to have been groomed by Hubbard to take his place when he dies. McMasters recently wrote a letter to Hubbard, and sent copies to "suppressives" and Scientology enemies. Although McMasters declared that "I shall never withdraw my allegiance to Ron or Scientology" he announced that he was leaving Hub- bard's ships to spread Scientology in Africa, because of his "horror at what such people on the Sea Org could do to mankind." He criticized Hubbard and Scientology for their "savage and vicious ethics" and seemed partic- ularly disturbed over the death of the three Los Angeles teen-agers. Their deaths may have partially precipitated McMasters' decision to dissociate himself from certain aspects of Scientology. "Somehow we are violating our basic ethics for such things to happen to us," he wrote. "These last two ghastly murders of our students, one of whom is a clear, need never have hap- pened if we hadn't been mocking up [making] enemies so solidly." - Page 105
"Charles Manson was a Scientologist - Page TWO - Lermanet.com
Funny little quip came up recently, not something I had looked at properly...but now I actually do get it. The X women, and I kind of felt a little bit intimidated at the time but didn't quite get it, now I do. I am NOT an X woman, I am still a woman and will be to my dying day. I might be an X scientologist child, and again, will be to my dying day, however I am NOT and Never will be an X scientologist, because I Never gave my consent to being a scientologist in the first place. I just happened to grow up in a family that thought Scientology was the bees knees,I didn't, but if you want to be a drone, KSW!
Mark Bunker·343 videosThe Process...The Propaganda...
Critics are calling Will Smith's new action film propaganda for The Church of ...
Ground Control to Major Tom...
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...#ixzz2VaTRQTsw
Processing, of which I have read volumes on, reeks to me of turning 'something' into 'something else' and that is how a fanatical scientologist appears or any other cult like behavior, from any other cult, or attitude that is so 'gung-ho' so as not to see any alternatives...there are many... but scientologists will NOT look... because... it totally annihilates their entire lives because they were cult members. 30, 40, 50 years of one way of thinking... that's a lot of mind control, and it ain't about to change any time soon.
Fortunately, for me at least, I was there with Hubbard at his worst, heavy Ethics, overboardings, lock-ups of children, up close and personal, I was locked up in the hold of the Apollo. My saving grace, was that my Father disappeared, my only family member left that I had previously had some contact with, be it brief.
I personally found amongst LRH's mail, I was his Messenger, an Ethics Chit to have me overboarded which I ripped up into tiny pieces and flushed down the toilet aboard the Apollo, and spent the next few days terrified of being found out. You think I would have got off of that ship if I had been found out. Not bloody likely!
What if I had been overboarded? I'll tell you now, chances are I would be dead, I could not swim and it was a long way down...
At the moment I am reading this, and it is taking much longer than I thought as I have limited time and there are a lot of links...
So while I am thinking about this...
Scientology and North Korea
And this
Karen#1
Jon Atack on Why It’s So Hard To Recover From Scientology
Click the preview vid on the right. Elizabeth Hayes interviews Jenna Hill(miscavige).
On Sunday,7:30
http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/
From Scientology
The Church has long respected the family unit while accommodating and
helping those raising children. The Church does not engage in any activities that
mistreat, neglect or force children to engage in manual labor. The Church follows
all laws with respect to children. Claims to the contrary are false.
It should be noted that Ms Hill as an adult voluntarily chose to continue in the
Church's religious order. However, those who successfully devote themselves to
any rigorous religious order do so with full commitment, without any sense of
entitlement and without any expectation of preferential treatment. Those who
decide a religious order isn't for them are free to move on with their lives, as Ms
Hill did. Every religion has its detractors; there is no faith that can satisfy
everyone's spiritual needs.
The Church of Scientology was never contacted by Ms Hill, her publisher, nor
her ghost writer at any time during the preparation of the manuscript. Had they
done so, the Church would have been able to correct the many documented
factual errors contained in it.
Revisionist histories are typical of apostate behavior and tabloid tales should
always be taken with an enormous grain of salt. The real story on the Scientology
religion, its beliefs and practices can be found at www.scientology.org.
Karin Pouw
Church of Scientology International
Poppycock!
AnonXSO·14 videosMaybe the the greatest recognition IS the recognition of what YOU have done!
Ten Reasons to Avoid ‘Scientology Warrior’
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/05/27/ten-reasons-to-avoid-scientology-warrior/
One Good Reason To Read ‘Scientology Warrior’
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/05/29/one-good-reason-to-read-scientology-warrior/
What Folks Are Saying about ‘Scientology Warrior’
Posted on May 31, 2013 by martyrathbun09 | 24 Comments
The
following are comments from a number of people of diverse
Scientology-related demographic backgrounds who have read, or allegedly
read, Memoirs of a Scientology Warrior (also available on Kindle):
Whistleblower:
It is an invaluable record of a remarkable history and contains many insights that were revelatory to me.
Anti Scientologist:
Your
lies, whether you know it or not (and I do not consider that you are
unaware), serve the Scientology cult head’s command intention.
Former Scientology insider:
I’ve
read a lot of books and there are some writers that I struggle reading.
They don’t flow or keep you interested. This book is not just
interesting but it flows and is easy to read… Marty answers just about
everything in this book. It is much more accurate and interesting than
the Wright book. Nothing is taken out of context.
Critical analyst of Scientology:
It’s a fascinating book, and there is a lot there that will contribute to the growing archive.
Former Scientologist:
Buy and read if you are an expert, or just curious, and you’re in the ex Scientologist community and know who Marty is.
Independent Scientologist:
Overall,
Marty, your book was both a vindication of the workability of the
subject of Scientology and also a poignant and honest representation of
the failed organization and the brilliant imperfect man who started it
all. And you’re right — the extremists in both camps will hate it. But I
reckon that those who can hew to the middle path will love it.
Scientology Hater:
As
in his first book, Rathbun once again feels compelled to tell us that
the genius of L. Ron Hubbard’s notion of a “clear” is a human being who
simply knows his or her “basic personality.” Rathbun is supremely
satisfied that this is what Hubbard gave him all along. Rathbun knows
himself, and that is enough. But after getting through this book’s 326
pages, it’s even clearer to us that Marty Rathbun hasn’t even begun to
understand himself or what he did in the name of Scientology.
Church of Scientology blogger Vince Fletcher:
Marty Rathbun was electric shocked – he says so.
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/what-folks-are-saying-about-scientology-warrior/
Cults, Enemies and Shadows
Posted on June 1, 2013 by martyrathbun09 | 228 Comments
In
the early eighties with the figurative barbarians at the gates of his
Scientology kingdom L. Ron Hubbard wrote a dispatch to his personal
services organization, Author Services Inc. (ASI), that stated in sum
and substance: a man’s worth can be judged by the stature of his
enemies. At the time he was referring to the fact that virtually all
major news media, the U.S. Department of Justice (including the FBI),
the IRS, and a number of other state, provincial and federal agencies in
several countries were in hot pursuit of Ron.
In its context the
advice from Ron seemed intended to steady the resolve and nerve of
those he had appointed with defending against his formidable enemies.
There is some truth to his little axiom. Whether it is honorable to
have so many law enforcement agencies after you is another question
entirely. Under Ron’s standard, Osama Bin Laden would be more worthy
than anyone in recent memory – including Ron himself.
Something I
find interesting is the number of people who twenty-seven years after
Ron’s death seem to derive their own sense of worth by virtue of
obsessively continuing to go after L. Ron Hubbard. More than a quarter
century after Ron’s death it seems that an active cult thrives on the
central religious practice of spitting on his grave.
Ironically,
the members of the cult regularly, blatantly and shameless exhibit many
of the behaviors they so indignantly protest in the cult Ron left
behind. They engage in thought-stopping, censorship by censure,
judgmentalism, stereotyping, ‘ends justify the mean’s,’ etc. You name
the cult characteristic they accuse Ron of and they have it down in
spades themselves. If someone gives Ron the slightest credit for ever
having displayed any human tendency that individual is castigated,
condemned and shunned violently. If a member of the anti Ron cult
steadfastly pledges allegiance to, and demonstrates it consistently,
condemning everything about Ron or the cult he left behind – or even
anyone who credits Ron with any act that cannot be characterized as
demonic -, why, that member is honored and can be seen to do no wrong.
Hell, he could figuratively get away with murder.
The central,
most unifying unwritten tenet of the anti Ron cult is that solely by
virtue of condemning Ron they are somehow victims and have thus
demonstrated honorable behavior. Notwithstanding that while the church
of Scientology is renowned for over-aggressive dealings with critics,
the most prominent members of the anti-Ron cult have never had a glove
laid upon them by Scientology. Most cult members attempt to position
themselves with those who have in fact been dogged by Scientology.
However, they have also conveniently omitted from the hagiographies
they have constructed for their heroes that most of the folks they
emulate have sold out to Scientology for hundreds of thousands or even
millions of dollars. So, you can add hyporcrisy to the list of
cult-like qualities of those obsessing with Ron.
One theme I
believe that may have been apparent in Memoirs of a Scientology Warrior
is that Ron Hubbard became the effect of factors he could have conquered
by application of the very principles he codified. In particular,
Ron’s decision to engage with and destroy his enemies resulted in his
unhappy demise. It stemmed from his violation of the following
fundamental Dianetics and Scientology principle which violation mars the
cult of his creation to this day: that which one obsessively resists
one becomes. It seems to me that by so aggressively demonizing Hubbard,
his enemies have followed suit on that score too.
It makes me
think that Ron (and the cult that arose to demonize him and yet wound up
mimicking him) should have taken the advice of Lao Tzu to heart when he
wrote in the Tao Te Ching that one ought to consider one’s enemy as the
shadow he himself casts.
related reading: The Great Middle Path Redux
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/06/01/cults-enemies-and-shadows/
Ten Reasons to Avoid ‘Scientology Warrior’
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/05/27/ten-reasons-to-avoid-scientology-warrior/
One Good Reason To Read ‘Scientology Warrior’
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/05/29/one-good-reason-to-read-scientology-warrior/
What Folks Are Saying about ‘Scientology Warrior’
Posted on May 31, 2013 by martyrathbun09 | 24 Comments
The
following are comments from a number of people of diverse
Scientology-related demographic backgrounds who have read, or allegedly
read, Memoirs of a Scientology Warrior (also available on Kindle):
Whistleblower:
It is an invaluable record of a remarkable history and contains many insights that were revelatory to me.
Anti Scientologist:
Your
lies, whether you know it or not (and I do not consider that you are
unaware), serve the Scientology cult head’s command intention.
Former Scientology insider:
I’ve
read a lot of books and there are some writers that I struggle reading.
They don’t flow or keep you interested. This book is not just
interesting but it flows and is easy to read… Marty answers just about
everything in this book. It is much more accurate and interesting than
the Wright book. Nothing is taken out of context.
Critical analyst of Scientology:
It’s a fascinating book, and there is a lot there that will contribute to the growing archive.
Former Scientologist:
Buy and read if you are an expert, or just curious, and you’re in the ex Scientologist community and know who Marty is.
Independent Scientologist:
Overall,
Marty, your book was both a vindication of the workability of the
subject of Scientology and also a poignant and honest representation of
the failed organization and the brilliant imperfect man who started it
all. And you’re right — the extremists in both camps will hate it. But I
reckon that those who can hew to the middle path will love it.
Scientology Hater:
As
in his first book, Rathbun once again feels compelled to tell us that
the genius of L. Ron Hubbard’s notion of a “clear” is a human being who
simply knows his or her “basic personality.” Rathbun is supremely
satisfied that this is what Hubbard gave him all along. Rathbun knows
himself, and that is enough. But after getting through this book’s 326
pages, it’s even clearer to us that Marty Rathbun hasn’t even begun to
understand himself or what he did in the name of Scientology.
Church of Scientology blogger Vince Fletcher:
Marty Rathbun was electric shocked – he says so.
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/what-folks-are-saying-about-scientology-warrior/
Cults, Enemies and Shadows
Posted on June 1, 2013 by martyrathbun09 | 228 Comments
In
the early eighties with the figurative barbarians at the gates of his
Scientology kingdom L. Ron Hubbard wrote a dispatch to his personal
services organization, Author Services Inc. (ASI), that stated in sum
and substance: a man’s worth can be judged by the stature of his
enemies. At the time he was referring to the fact that virtually all
major news media, the U.S. Department of Justice (including the FBI),
the IRS, and a number of other state, provincial and federal agencies in
several countries were in hot pursuit of Ron.
In its context the
advice from Ron seemed intended to steady the resolve and nerve of
those he had appointed with defending against his formidable enemies.
There is some truth to his little axiom. Whether it is honorable to
have so many law enforcement agencies after you is another question
entirely. Under Ron’s standard, Osama Bin Laden would be more worthy
than anyone in recent memory – including Ron himself.
Something I
find interesting is the number of people who twenty-seven years after
Ron’s death seem to derive their own sense of worth by virtue of
obsessively continuing to go after L. Ron Hubbard. More than a quarter
century after Ron’s death it seems that an active cult thrives on the
central religious practice of spitting on his grave.
Ironically,
the members of the cult regularly, blatantly and shameless exhibit many
of the behaviors they so indignantly protest in the cult Ron left
behind. They engage in thought-stopping, censorship by censure,
judgmentalism, stereotyping, ‘ends justify the mean’s,’ etc. You name
the cult characteristic they accuse Ron of and they have it down in
spades themselves. If someone gives Ron the slightest credit for ever
having displayed any human tendency that individual is castigated,
condemned and shunned violently. If a member of the anti Ron cult
steadfastly pledges allegiance to, and demonstrates it consistently,
condemning everything about Ron or the cult he left behind – or even
anyone who credits Ron with any act that cannot be characterized as
demonic -, why, that member is honored and can be seen to do no wrong.
Hell, he could figuratively get away with murder.
The central,
most unifying unwritten tenet of the anti Ron cult is that solely by
virtue of condemning Ron they are somehow victims and have thus
demonstrated honorable behavior. Notwithstanding that while the church
of Scientology is renowned for over-aggressive dealings with critics,
the most prominent members of the anti-Ron cult have never had a glove
laid upon them by Scientology. Most cult members attempt to position
themselves with those who have in fact been dogged by Scientology.
However, they have also conveniently omitted from the hagiographies
they have constructed for their heroes that most of the folks they
emulate have sold out to Scientology for hundreds of thousands or even
millions of dollars. So, you can add hyporcrisy to the list of
cult-like qualities of those obsessing with Ron.
One theme I
believe that may have been apparent in Memoirs of a Scientology Warrior
is that Ron Hubbard became the effect of factors he could have conquered
by application of the very principles he codified. In particular,
Ron’s decision to engage with and destroy his enemies resulted in his
unhappy demise. It stemmed from his violation of the following
fundamental Dianetics and Scientology principle which violation mars the
cult of his creation to this day: that which one obsessively resists
one becomes. It seems to me that by so aggressively demonizing Hubbard,
his enemies have followed suit on that score too.
It makes me
think that Ron (and the cult that arose to demonize him and yet wound up
mimicking him) should have taken the advice of Lao Tzu to heart when he
wrote in the Tao Te Ching that one ought to consider one’s enemy as the
shadow he himself casts.
related reading: The Great Middle Path Redux
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2013/06/01/cults-enemies-and-shadows/
TO LIE TO PEOPLE LIKE THAT!
So, where are YOU Tommy?
Hey, the leader of the Scientology organization, LRH put children in the chain locker, in the hold of the Apollo, but hey this does NOT happen anymore, does it? Of course it doesn't, we are in the 21st century aren't we??
And these fuckers are riding roughshod over peoples lives?
Tommy, where are YOU?
?
I Love this song... It says so much...without saying anything at all...The East Grinstead Song...
ThisisEastGrinstead·2 videos
anoninlondon·31 videos From WWP: https://whyweprotest.net/community/t...7-june.111534/
To be shown on Channel 4 (UK), 9pm 17 June 2013.
Likely to be available on 4oD (web streaming) shortly afterwards.
Scientologists at War examines the independent Scientology movement and the high level defectors who have publicly renounced their membership from the Church of Scientology.
Marty Rathbun is one of the most senior defectors in Scientology's history. As the former Inspector General of Ethics in the organisation that was created by science fiction writer L Ron Hubbard, Rathbun worked closely with its leader, David Miscavige, and celebrity follower Tom Cruise.
The film provides a rare insider view of the Church of Scientology.
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/s...es-1/episode-1
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/s...logists-at-war
Director(s):
Joseph Martin
Producer(s):
Danielle Clark
United Kingdom
2013
50 min
HDCAM 1080/25p
English
Contact
Mike Lerner
Executive Producer
Roast Beef Productions
mike@roastbeeftv.com
+44 2072402885
www.roastbeeftv.com
http://sheffdocfest.com/films/show/5491
http://www.roastbeeftv.com/
Photo from post on Tony's blog: http://tonyortega.org/2013/06/10/sci...ment-925602623
Selected GO and OSA documents
Zones of Action, Flag ORder 1890, by L. Ron Hubbard
A Piece of Blue Sky -- Scientology, Dianetics & L. Ron Hubbard ...
Bare-Faced Messiah: Chapter 18
The Mind Benders, Scientology - Chapter 11 - Cyril Vosper
dbdanger100·73 videos
Thanks much for sharing. Keep telling these tales of what OSA does when a 30 year veteran leaves after spending a $$$$ fortune in the church.
It boggles the mind how they make the parishioner the enemy.
You know, on the ship Apollo now and again someone wanted to leave. They were let go at the very next port. No imprisonment as is done on Freewinds, Int base, Pac base and all other bases currently. No lock down, no massive sec checking.
I recall LRH on the bridge of the Apollo giving a bear hug to someone who wanted to leave the SO to pursue a singing career. He empowered her with well wishes and forgave her freeloader bill on the spot.
I saw nothing but the highest ARC for a departure. What occurs now is unconscionable.
love/Karen
Janis | June 30, 2010 at 2:25 am | Reply
I know it took alot for you to step out and lay your story out for everyone. Things will get better. You and I have known Rinder since he was on the ship with us- for over 40 years the three of us have been friends, so you know you can trust him and also Marty who I have known for over 30 years – though each time I hear stories of PI watching over Marty, I think, pay back can be a bitch – (Marty your supposed to laugh at this statement). Anyway, welcome home, you are among friends. Your step-step
daughter (lol)
-
martyrathbun09
|
June 30, 2010 at 2:34 am
|
Reply
Janis, yeah, cracking up…
-
Karen#1
|
June 30, 2010 at 2:57 am
|
Reply
Thank you Janis
I cannot help but wonder... in fact I don't need to wonder... I KNOW, 100%. All Scientology has got left are the rats and here is the exterminator...You are family. I recall how you would wait outside my auditing room on the Flag ship Apollo ~~ getting me to write up the latest LRH research session ~~ ahhhh those were the days. And the message runs from the boss to me ~~~
I am proud of the fact that like you, we never once were busted even though we were on direct LRH lines. We never hit the skids on the Apollo, neither did Mike Rinder. We handled the ultra high randomity with flying colors.
We are old Apollo crew and we take care of our own…..
I had a good long chat last night with someone whom I value their opinion greatly and because of that I am going to endeavor to lay off you long time scientologists.However, if I ever see any of you trying to draw children into your belief system, well...that's another matter all together.
UK-National-Archives-Confidential-Home-Office-Paper-on-Scientology-MEPO-Nov-1975
LINK (HUGE)