Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Ron's Scientologists - 16 - Oct - 1965

The Bulletin, 16 Oct 1965, pp35, 37

Ron's Scientologists

"The Commies, the Socialists and the Catholics"

By BRIAN BUCKLEY

Lafayette Ronald Hubbard has not only visited the Van Allen Belt and Venus, he has been to heaven: "The first time I arrived the moment was dated at 43,891,832,611,177 years, 10 hours, 20 minutes and 40 seconds from 10.2 and a half p.m. daylight Greenwich time, May 9, 1963."

The implant was electronic by nature and arrival was by ship in the form of a doll body. The gates of heaven were, fortunately, open: "The gates of the first series are well done, well built. An avenue of statues of saints leads up to them. The gate pillars are surmounted by marble angels. The entering grounds are very well kept, laid out like bush gardens in Pasadena, so often seen in the movies. Aside from the implant boxes which lie across from each other on the walk there are other noises and sounds as though saints are defending and berating."


The Liberal-Country Party Government saw the force of his argument but was reluctant to let him take the initiative and decided to set up a Board of Inquiry into Scientology. The board was constituted and appointed in the person of Mr Kevin Anderson, QC, and it was confidently predicted by State Cabinet that the Labor thrust had been parried, and that the whole inquiry would be over and done within a couple of months.
Two years, 151 witnesses, and nearly 4 million words later, the Board has reported. At a cost of something more than £50,000, Mr Anderson has found that "Scientology is evil; its techniques evil; its practice a serious threat to the community medically, morally, and socially; its adherents sadly deluded and often mentally ill."
And Ron Hubbard? "... an American who now lives at Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex, England, who falsely claims academic and other distinctions and whose sanity is gravely to be doubted."

http://www.suburbia.com.au/~fun/scn/press/651016bu.htm

Amendment 8

Monday, 15 October 2012

Widespread Child Abuse in Scientology

These videos illustrate Scientology's psychological and physical abuse of its children (including their imprisonment, punishment and use as child labour in Rehabilitation Force Camps (RPF). 

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL57949E6289C2589A

October 20, 2012 - Millions of children around the world are exploited, abused, and discriminated against. It is because of the unique vulnerability of children that their rights are of priority concerning cults such Scientology, polygamist Mormon fundamentalist - Bountiful, and others. Child abuse in cults is common, and children are often cults' most devastating casualties.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baBTZbgvDEk&feature=g-all-u


Narconon Board of Directors Attacks Anonymous

“The group is focused on a leader to whom members seem to display excessively zealous, unquestioning commitment. •The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members. •The group is preoccupied with making money •Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished. •Mind-numbing techniques (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s). •The leadership dictates sometimes in great detail how members should think, act, and feel. •The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s), and members (for example: the leader is considered the Messiah or an avatar; the group and/or the leader has a special mission to save humanity).” - - (West & Langone 1986, 124).

So, the facts are, that Narconon’s Board of Directors are members of Scientology; the Narconon program is Scientology, and their claim that Narconon is a non-religious program, is more of a true statement than not when one considers Scientology to be a cult - - so be it Narconon.

http://www.examiner.com/article/narconon-georgia-board-of-directors-attacks-anonymous 

Sunday, 14 October 2012

Scientology is Scientology

Scientology is Scientology, there is no difference between the corporate "church" or Scientology "Lite", you either follow L. Ron Hubbard's doctrines or you don't! There is no in between, unless you are distancing yourself from L. Ron Hubbard, and eventually waking up to having been conned for most of your life.

The trap of a CULT is set on a gradient, so you do not realise what is happening to you, if it is done from being a young child, it is far harder to let go of the doctrines, they are built into your every breathing fibre, the core of self.

I was listening to Jefferson Hawkins last night, out of all the recent defectors of Scientology he struck me as a decent guy who doesn't bullshit, but even he still believes in the tenants of Scientology. He said himself, after thirty years it's hard to let go of a lifetime, my old friend Janis said she wouldn't let her life have been for nothing, or words to that effect. More recent defectors, Marty Rathbun gave the bulk of thirty years to Scientology and Mike Rinder was in from being a child and comes out in his 50s.I sympathize with some of these people but it does not mean that to carry on using the dictates of a vicious, lying science fiction writer that was in it only for power and money has to continue because these people cannot and will not admit how wrong L. Ron Hubbard was for locking young children up on board a ship

The reason Independent scientology insists on keeping a tight hold on their "religion" is because they have to hold onto something, it makes a mockery of the word 'Independent', they are still very dependent upon L. Ron Hubbard.The sad but funny thing is, L. Ron Hubbard, the one I knew in the 60s would be laughing his arse off at the very people that are keeping this charade going, just like filming and laughing at the overboarding. The abuse that is being committed right now in Scientology is exactly the same as it was in the old days, exactly! Who brought David Miscavige up? His parents? Or L. Ron Hubbard's Scientology?

David Miscavige's Scientology is a reenactment of L. Ron Hubbard's scientology. The abuse is written in the scripture.The main reason all these "Independent Scientologists" still remain dependent on scientology is they rely on one another too much, they have no idea what being Independent is.

http://www.iscientology.org/

Denise Brennan's review of 'What is Scientology' a book by Marty Rathbun, ex Inspector General of Scientology INC.

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2FSKHP296N8LS/ref=cm_cr_pr_viewpnt#R2FSKHP296N8LS

"See what you see, not what someone tells you to see" - L. Ron Hubbard

Saturday, 13 October 2012

Gruen Planet - The Master, Scientology and Tom Cruise

Mexico: Scientology applying for recognition as a church

Scientologists in Mexico applied to the Secretariat of the Interior (Secretariat of Governance) on December 12, 2011 for registration as a religious association. If they do not obtain it, they will claim discrimination.

Translation of a Spanish article posted on Feb. 25, 2012 on the website of the Mexican daily El Diario:
Solicitan cienciólogos otra vez ser registrados como iglesia
Quote:
Scientologists again applying to be registered as a church

by Verónica Sánchez
Agencia Reforma
February 25, 2012

Mexico City — With an 80-kilo dossier [NOTE: the second article below says 8, not 80], the Church of Scientology in Mexico is for a second time seeking registration as a religious association. Its earlier application in 1999 was not granted.

With the approval of their leaders, church members last December 12 presented to the Directorate of Religious Associations of the Secretariat of the Interior more than 1,700 pages of attestations to its activity in Mexico since the 1960s.

Luis González, director of Community Programs Support for the church, says that, at the time of the first application, the authorities argued that the church did not meet the requirement of having well-known roots, in other words a presence of five years in Mexico. Accordingly, the Directorate administratively withdrew the application and the case was closed.

González says that the church had provided statements from its members, but then requests began for statements from outside persons, from officials, notaries, etc.

"The requirements reached such a point that we had to put the application dossier on wheels."

To avoid the same outcome, González explains that the new dossier contains 200 statements from neighbors and workers in businesses located near Scientology's temples, from notaries who certify the actions that Scientologists have performed, as well as from officials with whom Scientologists have worked on charitable projects.

Due to the weight of the 13 folders, González says they had to be transported from the Scientology temple at the corner of Balderas and Juárez to the government offices at Paseo de la Reforma in a file cabinet to which wheels were added.

"It is clear in our conscience that, if registration is denied, it is solely because of discrimination. There wouldn't be any doubt for us, this is not because of the law.

"This is an issue of equity. Ultimately, it's about the workings of a secular state. Either we are all equal, or we are not," contends González.

González points out that Mexico is the Spanish-speaking country that has the highest number of Scientologists, a total of 5,300, but is paradoxically the only one where Scientology is not recognized as a religious association. He explains that the only reason for which registration is being sought is to comply with national regulations in this area and because Scientology's own members have requested it.

"It is part of our belief to know that we follow the rules and norms of a country. We are in 167 countries and the rules are very different in each country," says González.

Roberto Blancarte, director of the Center for Sociological Studies of El Colegio de México, says it is not customary for so many preconditions to be required of a church.

"There certainly has been more required from them than from others, so there is some fear they won't be treated equitably or justly," notes Blancarte.

According to the Law on Religious Associations, to obtain registration, the church must also prove that it has endeavored for the practice and propagation of a doctrine, that it has sufficient resources to devote to its purpose, and that it possesses internal statutes.

Blancarte mentions that, once the registration process begins, the Directorate of Religious Associations analyzes the submitted documentation but does not specify a time limit for its response.

When the Directorate lacks information, it notifies the organization and gives it three months to comply.

Translation of a Spanish article posted on February 23, 2012 on the website of the weekly Mexican magazine Milenio:
Cienciología solicita registro con 8 kilos de documentos
Quote:
Group wants to avoid second denial

Scientology seeks registration with 8 kilos of documents

by Eugenia Jiménez
February 23, 2012

Scientology has for the second time applied to the Secretariat of the Interior for registration to become a religious association. Approximately 8 kilos of information were submitted to avoid having the request turned down because of a lacking document.

On December 12 of last year, church members delivered various letters in which they explain the work they've done together with the Federal Attorney General's Office in prevention programs against drug use, along with testimonials from neighbors and businesses near Scientology temples to demonstrate that Scientology has well-known roots in the community.

Ana Rosa Lugo and Luis González, two of the church's leaders, announced that the certified documentation has been delivered, with the signatures of public notaries who validated public religious activities and exhibitions about the meaning of Scientology.

The dossier consists of more than 200 statements from neighbors who provided visual testimony and are not members of the church, but work in nearby businesses.

Scientology's first application to become a religious association was filed in 1998, but the Secretariat of the Interior denied it in 1999 because it was not proven that Scientology has well-known roots among the population, even though this group has existed in Mexico since 1960.

For the 1998 registration request, only statements from Scientologists were provided to the Secretariat of the Interior, and the Secretariat explained that this was not valid. This time, neighbors were sought out and their statements were made before a notary. Documents from the boroughs of the Federal District were also submitted.

Ever since the year in which the denial of registration occurred, the leaders of the church have held meetings with the Directorate of Religious Affairs to find out the causes that led to the refusal of status as a religious association.

The process has taken 14 years, but during that time, the authorities have been given reports about what the activities of the church are.

It is "awkward not being registered like other churches, because both they and our parishioners have been asking us why the church doesn't have the registration," explains Luis González.

Scientology is currently present at the national level and its facilities are located in Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey. It has 5 thousand followers.



Translation of a Spanish article posted on October 10, 2012 on the website of the Mexico City daily newspaper Excelsior:
Ahora, cienciología
Quote:
Now Scientology ...

by Enrique Aranda
October 10, 2012

Its mandate now about to end in December, the second Mexican federal government formed by the National Action Party is preparing to strike a hard blow—"one more" as some would say—to the Catholic Church, whose doctrine the party say it draws upon and whose principles, the party’s members claim, entirely or at least partly inspire their actions.

Within a few days, Alejandro Poiré, the Secretary of the Interior, and undersecretary Gustavo Mohar are expected to sign and officially deliver the registration that recognizes the "church" of Scientology as a religious association. This will deepen the profound differences that, for the past six years, at least, have characterized the relationship between government authorities and the Catholic hierarchy, which formally represents more than 80% of Mexico’s population.

Today, it is, in fact, safe to say that official recognition has already been granted to Scientology, even though a third party could legally challenge this decision, but the fact is that the favorable outcome was announced last September 13 in the Diario Oficial [“Official Gazette”], which clearly stated that Scientology’s promoters had exhibited "sufficient evidence to prove that the religious group has existed for a long time and has well-known roots among the population."

It should be emphasized that the application filed, curiously enough, on December 12, 2011 [December 12 is the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe, a national symbol of Mexico] was not the first attempt by Scientology—a philosophical/religious system based on the teachings of Lafayette Ronald Hubbard and claimed to promote self-realization through a spiritual therapeutic method—to seek legal recognition. It had already tried in 1999 and the request was denied ... as had happened before in countries such as Greece, Ireland, Chile, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Belgium ... or even in Spain, where it only succeeded after lengthy litigation.

This time, however, the services of Roberto Blancarte, director of the Center for Sociological Studies of El Colegio de México, and Jonathan Marduk Rico, Scientology’s spokesman for Latin America, paid off in getting the authorities to put aside the very serious potential or real public allegations leveled against Scientology by various sources—brainwashing for financial gain, psychological and physical abuse of its followers—and, moreover, to ignore the experience that has prompted other countries to proceed with caution in assessing similar requests for recognition.

But what truly matters now in this case, beyond the granting of registration in itself, is the serious confusion and malaise that this recognition will generate (and has already caused) between the Catholic hierarchy and other faiths. There will undoubtedly be a (political) cost to pay.

We shall see, and we will no doubt be commenting on this again ...