What is Scientology?

Well, that depends on how close to L. Ron Hubbard you were.It depends on whether or not you thrive on oppression. If you do, then Scientology is for you, but if you don't your an SP.

I am an SP, that is Suppressive Person for anyone that does not understand that statement.According to L. Ron Hubbard that is 1.1 on the tone scale and here I am on that tone scale:

Covert Hostility:

http://www.scientologyhandbook.org/FULL.HTM

What is most remarkable is when I was on the ship I was numb, that according to Hubbard is .94, it really is amazing because since then I have become uptone, I'm now 1.1 - Covert hostility. It took me me almost 40 years to get that far up the tone scale. Can you believe that? Now, that's a SUCCESS STORY!

Scientology really works, no wonder you need a billion year contract, to finally hit Serenity of Beingness is gonna take some doing! I guess I will need to go to Target Two to finally make it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXg0zpJwUZI

I'll have you know I am not just Suppressive, I am a degraded being also, because I fraternize with other SPs. OOPs! And, not just any old SP but journalists. Do you know what LRH thought about Journalists? They were labeled " Merchants of Chaos" and here you will see why:
http://www.xenu.net/archive/infopack/14.htm

Tony Ortega tonight really knocked my socks off,he does some great journalism about Scientology, but tonight was the best!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=y2Wx2M7a5Wg

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/02/5_biggest_lies_scientology_tv_ad.php

Look at both sides;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBz5Xic_Y2s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez3oT8ei4bUhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc29NLW70lA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWKRpTzsGjE

And then when you think, this surely can't be true, look here:
http://www.lermanet.com/ but of course there is one place i never go to except on odd occasions and that is Marty Rathbuns blog and why is that you might wonder? Because he would determine me 1.1, Suppressive Person and he would be right in his Hubbardian world.But , I live in a wog world, not a Hubbardian world and that is where real people live.

Jan Easgate Charged with Perverting the Course of Justice.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lC0N8wxgmn4

Scientology figure charged again
February 8, 2012 - 10:44AM


                                 SYNDEY MORNING HERALD


AAP

An international Church of Scientology figure accused of coaching a child to lie about sex abuse has been charged for a second time.

Janice Meyer, 57, appeared in a Sydney court in June last year accused of perverting the course of justice in 1985.

The allegation was that Meyer, who also goes by the name Jan Eastgate, threatened and intimidated an 11-year-old girl into providing false information to police about being abused by a Scientologist.

A court spokesman said another offence relating to perverting the course of justice was heard at Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday.

The matter will be back in court on April 24 and a two-day committal hearing will begin on May 15.

Meyer is an Australian citizen who has lived in the US since 1993.

During her first court appearance, her bail was relaxed so she could travel to California.

Meyer holds a position with the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, an organisation founded by the Church of Scientology to campaign against psychiatry.

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/scientology-figure-charged-again-20120208-1rais.html


The Sun
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/scientology-figure-faces-new-charge-in-sex-abuse-case/story-e6frf7jx-1226265522798


Perth Now
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/breaking-news/scientology-figure-faces-new-charge-in-sex-abuse-case/story-e6frg12u-1226265522798?from=public_rss

villagevoice
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/02/scientology_hea.php

Thanks go to Ididn'tcomeback:
http://kiwianon.com/forums/index.php?action=recent

Marc and Claire Headley's Appeal Case.

http://infinitecomplacency.blogspot.com/2012/02/headleys-go-to-appeal.html?utm_source=BP_recent 

Hubbards Communication Office 3

HCO Policy Letter 12 June 1965.
Forming the Foundation.
Why Ethics?

You can't run pcs without Ethics to hand. Technical fact. Particularly on lower level processes and also on Power Processes, the Potential Trouble Source (connected to a Suppressive) will go to pieces under auditing - not improve.

Current statistic on this is 20% PTS or mild SP and of this 2and a half% is very vicious SP.

Your D of T can't train a class that has a PTS or SP in it. Your D of P can't audit people if he can't handle this PTS and SP factor efficiently.

Your Dir of Review will go round the bend if he can't shunt PTSs or SPs to Ethics. He'll have to become the Ethics Officer.

_________________________________________________________________________________

HCO Policy Letter 20 February 1965.

Appointments and Programmes.

I will continue as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Hubbard Association of Scientologists International the company which operates all Scientology Organizations over the world and St. Hill.

MarySue will continue as a Director on the Board and Secretary.

Marilyn Routsong will continue as a director on the Board and Treasurer of the Company, and is appointed Acting Director of HASI and all it's organizations including St. Hill.

Herbie Parkhouse is appointed Acting Organization Secretary, St. Hill.

MarySue is appointed Staff Training Officer.

MarySue is appointed my personal assistant for the assembly of technical data and new courses under the title of Director of Technology.

Reg Sharpe is appointed a personal asst as Director of Compilation including all educational aids, dictionaries and encyclopedias and films.

Anton James is appointed acting Head of the St. Hill Book Department as acting Supervisor of Publications.

OUR FUTURE

All our actions are influenced to a remarkable degree by the state of World Affairs.

A cautious estimate of the governmental situation as of this date is that unless something intervenes, World War III is less than five years away, but it may occur within three years.Thus we are not operating with all the time margin we could hope for. We have been lucky so far. We have held things together long enough to achieve our technology while there was still peace.

I hardly need remind anyone that we are the only organization that knows where it's going and have a chance to do something. Even our enemies give us that. Others have neither answers nor hope. And all our really rough spots are behind us.

We were rather pinned down so long as our technology was incomplete, but now this and the time consumed in technical changes has ended.

We have the most formidable array of answers ever assembled. Our technology is now not only developed but is tested and sound. We have not only the new but also the old. And it will also serve.

Scientology is the only game where everybody wins.

And we are winning.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Hasi Policy Letter 30 August 1957
I have sent L. Ron Hubbard, Jr (Nibs) to London to:
Improve technical performance in teaching and training and staff in general.

Give the October Congress.

In October Nibs will return to the US. In December Fudge will return to Washington. I want to hear from them how well they were treated by those in London and to hear them report that the British Auditor is again the best in the world.

Sometime this fall I will see for myself how good we can get.
For yourstable data, look at these:

Nibs - Technical
Fudge - Administration
Got it?
My Best,
Ron

____________________________________________________________________________________

HCO Policy Letter 23 May 1968

Important
WW and St. Hill
Recombined ( deadline 15 June 1968)

The AO exists to make OTs and support the Sea Org so that the planet can be brought under control and a safe environment provided in which the planet's 4th Dynamic can be cleared. The Sea Org discipline keeps the lines channeled so that the outer orgs, SH and WW can do their jobs.

____________________________________________________________________________________

HCO Policy Letter 12 February 1970
Issue II  Urgent and Important to WW
Reviewing actions of the past year and a half.

Musical Chairs
One avoids musical chairs in an org. But one doesn't permit destructive or non-compliant persons in key posts.
Loyalty
Staff members who stick with it through thick and thin count for much and this factor is a large one. They should not be mauled around.
FreeLoaders
Training in upper orgs for staff members in lower orgs should be okayed by EC WW first and an undated note for the expense to the lower org should be made out and signed. Accurate Freeloader lists should be made and kept and the offender considered dead so far as the org are concerned as experience shows they are often wildly out Ethics otherwise.

____________________________________________________________________________________
HCO Policy Letter 15 February 1962

APPOINTMENT

Edgar Watson is herewith appointed HCO Technical Material Secretary WW.

This post includes Book Administration WW as well as the testing and supply of E-Meters, and the administration of all matters pertaining thereto.

( My note: Have added this appointment as this is the man that got my Father into Scientology)
___________________________________________________________________________
HCO Policy Letter of 28 April 1968
( Amends HCO Pol Ltr of 4 Oct 1967 Issue II)
ORG EXEC SEC AND DISTRIBUTION

The Org Exec Sec of any org which does not have a full time Public Executive Secretary who has that post only and whose Public Divisions are not fully operating in all departments with all Dist Programmes is automatically in NON-EXISTENCE and has no rights as his omission amounts to a restriction of his org and nullification of the efforts of his staff and a betrayal of humanity.

Failure to have Public Divisions effectively operating in all departments is a withhold of processing and salvation from the human race.
L. Ron Hubbard.
Founder.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Hardly surprising that the FBI wrote a comment on one of L. Ron Hubbard's letters "appears mental".

The extreme and repetitive nature of Hubbard's denunciations of his colleagues soon convinced the FBI that Hubbard was essentially a crank. The agent who interviewed him in March 1951 described Hubbard in a subsequent report as "a mental case", and next to another Hubbard letter written to the Bureau on 11 July 1955 is the annotation "appears mental". From that point on, the FBI did not bother replying to his letters "because of their rambling, meaningless nature and lack of any pertinence to Bureau interests." ⁸ This did not deter Hubbard from continuing to write to the Bureau. Only when he became convinced that the US Government was in fact his enemy did he desist. 

http://www.xenu.net/archive/FBI/

Just a few excerpts from L. Ron Hubbard's vast collection of Policy Letters used to run this organization known as the "church" of Scientology.

Hubbards Communications Office.2.

Hubbard Communications Office, St. Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex.
HCO Policy Letter of 20 October 1967.
Remimeo
Admin Know - How, Conditions, How to Assign.

Every post and part of an org must have a statistic which measures the volume of product of that post. The head of a part has the statistic of that post. Every post or part of an org has a product. If it has no product it is useless and supernumerary.

An Exec Sec has the products of his or her portion of the org. The first product of an Exec Sec is of course his or her portion of the orgs divisions. If the portion itself does not exist then of course the Exec Sec has no stat at all as an Exec Sec even if very busy - so he or she is not an Exec Sec despite the title. This is true of a department head and a unit head. One can't really be the one in charge if the thing one is in charge of doesn't exist.

Also things that don't exist themselves can have no product. The whole rationale(basic idea) of the pattern of an org is a unit of 3 These are:
THETAN
MIND -}BODY -}PRODUCT

In Division One the HCO Sec is the thetan. Department One the MIND, Department Two the BODY and Department Three the PRODUCT. The same pattern holds for every division. It should also hold for every department and lower section and unit. And above these it holds for a portion of an org.

In the HCO portion of the org we have the HCO Exec Sec as the Thetan, the Exec Div (7) as the MIND, Division One as the BODY and Division Two as the PRODUCT. And so with other parts of an org, they always go
THETAN
MIND}BODY}PRODUCT

Now if you know and understand and can apply this you can not only plan or correct an org or one of it's parts, you can also assign Conditions correctly.You need data gained from inventories or counts of items or the statistic assigned and drawn.It is not enough to only follow graphs. That is lazy lazy lazy no confront method when used alone. Graphs can be falsified, can be too fixed on one thing and can ignore others unless you read all the graphs of the part you are interested in.

Graphs are a good indicator and should be used whenever possible. BUT you must also keep in mind that it requires ALL the graphs to be wholly accurate in a Conditions assignment and the most accurate Conditions assignment possible and that the graphs must be based on ACTUAL figures.So to begin,You look at the graphs. You look for recent ups and downs. Then you look for trends(long range drifts up or down) Then you look for discrepancies. Like the high enrollment-low income, high letters out,low enrollment weeks later. It is safe enough at first to simply assign moderate conditions.(Emergency. Normal. Affluence.)by the current ups and downs of the graphs. This should result in expansion..

EXPANSION(product increase) is THE WHOLE REASON you are assigning Conditions in the first place, so you expect reasonably that if you assign Conditions by graph you will get expansion. Now after a while(weeks or months)you see you are getting expansion. So you go on assigning Conditions by graph. An Exec Sec would also inspect the physical areas of Dangers and Affluences as a matter of course.

BUT let us take the reverse case. You assign Conditions by graph(and inspections of Danger and Affluence)and what you are assigning Conditions to doesn't expand!

Well now we have to get to work. There is something wrong.

The first thing that can be wrong is that what you are assigning Conditions to really doesn't exist. The Director of Comm does not have a Department of Comm. He only has a messenger-telex operator, no way to handle his other departmental functions and answers the phone himself.So, Finding no Department REGARDLESS OF OTHER REASONS ("can't get staff" "income too low" "no quarters") you bang him with a Condition of Non-Existance. Because he obviously doesn't exist as a Dir Comm, having no Comm Dept.( Non- Existance is also assigned for NO USE and NO FUNCTION.)Now if this assignment to the Dir Comm of Non Existence- with no further help from you, mind-does not result in a Comm Dept in a reasonable time you assume he doesn't want to be there and you assign a Condition of Liability.

You don't explain it all away. That's what he's doing so why imitate him?

You don't say, "He's just overwhelmed-new-needs a review-netter netter figure figure." You simply ASSIGN!

He STILL doesn't get a Comm Dept there.

You inspect.You find the Ethics Officer isn't enforcing the Liability penalty ("Pete is my pal and I....")So you assign the Ethics Officer a Condition of Liability as he gets, naturally, what he failed to enforce.

Now they mutiny and you assign a Condition of Treason, shoot both of them from the guns and fill the posts.The new incumbents you tell, "The boys before you aren't here now and aren't likely to be trained or processed until we get around to the last dregs so we hope you do better. You begin in Non-Existence. I trust you will work your way out of it into Danger before the week is out. As you are just on post, the penalties do not apply for Non - Existence. But they will after 30 days. So lets get a Dept of Comm and an Ethics Section.

Now of course if the E/O had to be shot from guns, DirIR is at once assigned a DANGER CONDITION complete with penalties as that section was in his/her dept.If there's no HCO (Div 7, 1,2) part of the org, the LRH Comm of that org yells for the next senior org to act. And if there's no LRH Comm the next senior org should see that it's gone by lack of stats or reports or expansion and act anyway.

Now you say, "But that's ruthless! No staff would."

well, such a statement reasoning is contrary to facts. The only time(by actual experience and data) you loose staff and have an unstaffed org is when you let low stat people in. low stat personnel gets rid of good staff members. An Org can't be staffed has an SP in it!

Orgs where Ethics is tight and savage grow in numbers!

Man thrives oddly enough only in the presence of a challenging environment. That isn't my theory. That's fact. If the Org environment is not challenging there will be no org.

We help beyond any help ever available anywhere. We are a near ultimate in helping. At once this loads us with SPs who would commit suicide to prevent anyone from being helped and it lays us wide open as "softees" to any degraded being that comes along.They are sure we won't bite so they do anything they please.

Conditions correctly assigned alone can dtect and eject SPs and DBs.

So if we help so greatly we must also in the same proportion be able to discipline. Near ultimate help can only be given with near ultimate discipline.

Tech can only stay itself where Ethics is correctly and ruthlessly administered.Admin like ours has to be high because our orgs handle the highest commodity - life- itself.

So our Admin only works where tech is IN. And our tech only works where Ethics is in.

Our target is not a few psychiatric patients but a cleared universe. So what does THAT take? The lowest confront there is is the Confront of Evil. When a living being is out of his own valence and in the valence of a thoroughly bad even if imaginary image you get an SP. An Sp is a no-confront case because, not being in his own valence, he has no viewpoint from which to erase anything. that is all an SP is. BUT the amount of knowing havoc an SP can cause is seen easily if only in this planets savage cruel wars.

An executive who cannot confront evil is already enroute to becoming suppressive.Next door to the "theetie- weetie" case is the the totally overwhelmed condition we call SP(Suppressive Person).

It is so easy to live in fairyland where nothing evil is ever done. One gets the image of a sweet old lady standing in the middle of a gangster battle with bodies and blood spattering the walls saying"It's so nice, it's only a boys game with toy guns."

The low statistic staff member who never gets his stats up is making low stats. He isn't idle. It's a goodie-goodie attitude to say "He just isn't working hard" The chronic low stat person is working VERY HARD to keep the stat DOWN.When you learn that you can assign Conditions and make an Org expand. When stats WON@T come up, you drop the condition down. Sooner ofr later you will hit the REAL condition that applies. Conversely as you upgrade conditions you will also reach the condition that applies. Some staff members are in chronic power. Who ever assigns it? They take over a post - it's stats soar.Well to measure just stats of the post taken over as his condition is false since his personal condition is and has been power. And if it is power, then that personal condition should be assigned. That is very easy to see.

BUT what if you have a personnel who whenever he or she takes over the post the stats collapses!Well you better assign that one too. For just as the one in Power works to maintain up stats, the one in lower conditions, whether one cares to confront it or not, works too and is just as industriously collapsing not only his own post stats but also the posts adjacent to his!So he is at least a Condition of Liability as the post if vacant would only be in Non- Existence!

And as somebody next to it might do a little bit for it, it might even get up to Danger Condition, completely unmanned!

DISCREPANCIES

When there are discrepancies amongst statistic graphs SOME graph is false.When you find a false graph you assign anyone who falsified it intentionally and knowingly a Condition of Liability for that action is far worse than a no-compliance.

And you had better be alert to the actual area where the false graph originated as it has a tiger in it.Only physical inspection of a most searching kind ( or a board if it is distant) will reveal the OTHER crimes going on there. There are always other crimes when you get a false report. Experience will teach one i that if he really looks.

RECIPROCITY

It is more than policy that one gets the Condition he fails to correctly and promptly assign and enforce.
It's a cort of natural law.

If you let your executives goof off and stay in, let us say, a Danger Condition yet you don't assign and enforce one, they will surely put you in a Danger condition whether it gets assigned or not.

Remember that when your finger falters "ON the trigger" The natural law stems from this appalling fact.

We didn't a long time ago, get in Ethics.We goofed. And the whole race went into the soup where it remains to this day.

And if we are to live
 in this universe at all at all we are going to have to get in Ethics and clean it up. Whether that's easy to confront or not is besides the point.the horrid truth is our fate is FAR more unconfrontable!

Now we have to have highly skilled Tech to bail us out. And I assure you that tech will never get in or be used beneficially at all unless:
1. We get Ethics in, and
2. Unless Scientology orgs expand at a regular rate.

Only then can we be free.
So that's how and WHY you assign and enforce Conditions. It's the only way everyone will win.

LRH:jp.rd
Copyright (c) 1967 L. Ron Hubbard
by L. Ron Hubbard Founder.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Remember this next time your stats are dropping.Lock a few kids up, I assure you your stats will soar and everyone will win!

Scientology Convicted of Fraud and Illegal Practise of Pharmacy in France.

http://infinitecomplacency.blogspot.com/

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/12808319/france-labels-scientology-a-fraud/

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/12793170/french-court-upholds-scientology-fraud-conviction/ 

More from Sheila huber "On the Tech".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0i2zoee4cnU